← Club home
2026 Doubles League

Ranking & Points System

How match wins, games, and head-to-head decide the ladder — and how the season leads into the play-offs.

RELATEDHow it works ↗Code of Play ↗Semis & Finals ↗2026 Season ↗

The short version

You're ranked as an individual, not as a team — your record is built from every match you play, alongside different partners each time.

You're ranked first by how often you win — your Win % (matches won ÷ scheduled) — so playing more matches doesn't pad it, and playing fewer doesn't sink it. When records are level, Games % breaks the tie, so competing hard still pays.

Can't make a night? Line up a substitute in advance and clear it with the organizers — your night is then set aside, no harm. Simply not showing (and no sub) is a loss worth zero games.

Players level on Win % are separated in order by games %, then head-to-head, then countback. Everything below is just the detail.

⚡ Just tell me what to do
How to read this page
Green = why a rule is fair Blue = a note / clarification Dashed = how the pros do it (optional) grey chip = voided, doesn't count  ·  coloured chip = counts

The idea in one line

Because everyone partners everyone, we rank individual players, not fixed teams. Each player's record is built from every match they play across the season, with different partners. The player who wins the biggest share of their matches gets the top seed. The three events — Men's Doubles, Women's Doubles, and Mixed — each keep their own separate standings.

How players are ranked

Applied in order. Each step only breaks ties left by the step above it.

Winning is what counts — measured as Win %. Your rank is driven first by how often you win: matches won ÷ scheduled matches. It's a rate, not a raw count, so playing extra matches doesn't pad it and a smaller fixed schedule doesn't sink it — byes and shared slots stay fair, and a strong player on six matches can still top a busier one on ten. When players tie on Win %, Games % breaks it — that's where competing hard still pays: winning decisively and losing narrowly lifts your share of games. Miss a scheduled night with no substitute and it's a loss that drops your Win %, so simply not showing costs you. Head-to-head, then countback, settle anything still level.

A few terms, defined

Scheduled match
A match on your fixture list. Your Win % is your wins ÷ how many you were scheduled for — voided matches (a cancellation, or a night you subbed out of) don't count toward it.
Win % — your “rate”
How often you win: matches won ÷ scheduled matches. A rate, not a raw count — so a smaller schedule neither helps nor hurts.
Games %
Games you won ÷ all games you played. Rewards winning decisively and losing narrowly. The first tiebreak, used when players are level on Win %.
Head-to-head (in doubles)
Counts only matches where the tied players were on opposing pairs. If they never faced each other, or three-plus are tied, it can't separate them and the standings fall to countback.
Countback
The last-resort separator when head-to-head can't decide: line up each tied player's matches from most games won to fewest and compare them position by position — their best night vs their best night, second vs second, and so on. The first difference decides. If the two played different numbers of matches, the shorter list's missing slots count as zero. If every position is identical, a coin toss.
Provisional & the minimum to be seeded
To earn a play-off seed you must have played at least half of your scheduled matches (rounded up). Below that you're shown but tagged provisional and ranked behind everyone who qualified.
No counted matches yet
A player whose matches were all voided (cancellations, or nights they subbed out of) has no rate to compute — their Win % and Games % would divide by zero. They're shown as unranked / provisional and hold no ladder position until they have at least one match that counts.
Sub cap
A season limit of one-fifth of your scheduled matches (rounded up, minimum 1), each cleared by the organizers. For 2026 that works out to 4 for a 17-match schedule (a men's player who also plays mixed), 3 for an 11–12-match schedule, 2 for a shared-slot member's 6, and 1 for a 5-match slate.

How a match is scored

Best of 3 sets, first to 4 games. At 3–3, a 5-point tie-break decides the set and is recorded as 4–3. Win 2 sets to win the match. A tennis match can't end in a tie — there's always a winner — so "draws" never appear in your record; ties only happen in the standings table and are broken by the steps above.

Special situations — crediting records fairly

Most nights are simple: four players show up and a match is played. This part covers the situations that aren't — in the order they actually unfold: first the league tries a substitute; if none can be found it's a walkover (or a double walkover if neither side shows); a match that starts but can't finish is a retirement; a no-fault cancellation is voided; and a shared position is credited to whoever plays. Every rule here is benchmarked against USTA and the pro tours; the footnotes at the end of this part show the crosswalk.

SituationWhat happens to the recordWho's creditedScheduled match?USTA / pro-tour parallel
Substitute
Consented stand-in — tried first
Real match for all who played; absentee's slot voided Partner & opponents; the sub (guest or member) gets no credit No — for the absentee An alternate doesn't inherit the replaced player's record3
Walkover
One side no-shows, no sub
Present pair a win, no-show a loss; no games added The pair that showed up Yes — still counts A walkover is a win with no score played1
Double walkover
Neither side shows
Both pairs a loss; no games; no winner No one — no win awarded Yes — still counts A double default: neither is credited, neither advances7
Retirement
Starts but can't finish
Games so far stand; the rest is forfeited Opponents take the win; games as played Yes — counts Games at retirement stand; the rest a forfeit1
Cancelled
Weather / mutual, no fault
Organizer voids it; excluded for all in it No one in the match No Unplayed / abandoned matches are disregarded2
Shared slot
Two split one position
Each keeps their own line; never merged Only the one who plays that night Per match actually played Alternates & team rosters — each judged on own matches4

Read across a row for the rule; the full detail and the rules crosswalk are below.

1 ·Substitution — the flexible first option

The first move when a player can't make their match. Before anyone concedes a walkover, the player, their partner, or the organizers try to line up a stand-in — an outside guest or another league member — so the match can still be played, with the opponents' agreement and the organizers' sign-off. It's the flexible option, and it's what the league reaches for first; only if no substitute can be found does the match fall through to a walkover (next). Unlike a walkover, someone does play; unlike a cancelled match, it's contested and counts for everyone on court.

Substitute A stand-in plays, opponents agree

The night is scored as a real match for everyone who actually played — the partner and both opponents are credited with their win or loss and their games, exactly like any other match. The substitute earns no credit for it — no games, no win or loss, and no change to their own rank or record. The stand-in can be an outside guest or another league member; either way the sub match never lands on the sub's own line.

Absent player Voided on their line — no fault

Because they arranged a stand-in and the opponents agreed (mutual, no fault), the absentee's slot is voided on their line only — excluded from their record and not counted as a scheduled match. They neither gain nor lose. Doing it the right way beats a silent no-show.

Why only who plays is credited. It's the same principle as a shared slot — only the player who actually took the court is credited. A stand-in filling in still gives the other three a genuine match, so their results stand; the absent player is judged only on matches they personally played, never on a stand-in's night.
Consent is the fairness valve. The opponents choose whether to accept the stand-in. If they'd rather not — say the sub plays at a very different level — they can decline, and the night reverts to a walkover in their favour. Accepting the sub is always their call.

Guard-rails, so a void can't be used to dodge

Worked example. Player S is a strong player — 3–1, 30 games across the nights he played — who misses one match. a stand-in (guest or league member) steps in with his partner and loses. Under a substitution, that night is voided on Player S's line, so he's judged only on the matches he actually played.
Treatment of the missed nightSchedPldWLWin %Games won
Substitution voided on his line443175%30
Walkover if no sub were arranged553260%30

Reading it: Player S is a 75% winner (3 of 4) on the nights he actually played, and the substitution judges him on exactly that. Treated as a walkover, the same missed night adds a loss, dropping his win rate to 60% (3 of 5). His games won are identical (30) either way — it's the extra scheduled loss that moves his Win %, so a walkover punishes an arranged, consented absence as if he'd ducked. The stand-in's result, win or lose, never lands on his line — nor on the stand-in's own, if they're a league member.

Rules crosswalk At the ATP Finals an alternate who steps in is scored on their own account and “does not inherit the results of the player he is replacing”3. PTC keeps the “never inherit” half — the absent player is never credited for a stand-in's night — but goes one step further: because our ladder is per scheduled match, the sub earns no credit either (guest or league member alike), so an off-schedule fill-in can't pad anyone's average. USTA credits the player who takes the court and permits substitutes only by sanction6; PTC requires organizer approval and opponent consent for every sub.

2 ·When no sub is found — walkover & cancellations

A walkover is the fallback: if no substitute can be arranged, the match can't be played normally, and how it's scored depends on who's at fault — one side, both sides, or nobody. Each was chosen as the fairest option after testing it from every player's point of view.

Walkover One side can't field a team

If a pair can't field a team and no sub is arranged, the match is a walkover: the pair that showed up is credited the win; the no-show side takes a loss. No sets or games are added (none were played), so the no-show simply takes the loss — a real dent to their Win % over a match that still counts. Protects the players who turned up; removes any reward for skipping a tough match.

Double walkover Neither side shows

If no one turns up and no subs are found, there's no pair present to award a win to — so nobody is credited a win. Both pairs take a loss with no games, and because both sides are at fault it still counts as a scheduled match for all four players. It is not voided — that would let two players who both skipped escape the penalty. This is the standard double default: no winner, and neither side gains.

Cancelled Weather / mutual, no fault

Different cause, different handling: the match is voided by the organizers — excluded from the record of everyone in it, and it doesn't count as a scheduled match either, so their Win % isn't affected. Nobody is punished for something outside their control. Only organizers can void a match, so it can't be used to dodge a likely loss — and a double no-show is not “no fault,” so it never qualifies.

Retirement / injury A match that starts but can't finish

Different from a walkover, because tennis was played. If a player can't continue — injury or illness — the games already won stand for everyone, the pair that can't continue forfeits the rest, and their opponents are credited the win. The match counts as scheduled and played, carrying whatever games were banked up to the stoppage. A match stopped by weather that can't be resumed is treated as a cancellation instead — no fault, voided.

Leaving mid-season. If a player withdraws from the league partway through, their completed matches stand for everyone who already played them; their remaining matches are voided (like cancellations), so no one is handed a free walkover win by luck of the fixture order. A player below the seeding minimum when they leave simply isn't seeded.
Why this is the fair choice. Charging a loss to both sides of a one-sided no-show would punish the player whose opponent didn't show — so only the no-show side is charged. Voiding everything would let someone dodge a likely loss with no penalty — so a void is reserved for genuine no-fault cancellations. And when neither side shows, both are charged (a double walkover), since no one was present to earn the win. The consented substitute above is always the better path — it keeps the match alive rather than conceding any of these.
Rules crosswalk A walkover is recorded across sanctioned tennis as a win for the player who turned up, with no match score played1 — PTC matches this, and (like ATP round-robin standings, where matches played is itself a tiebreaker, so a 1–2 record outranks 1–1) still counts the no-show as a scheduled slot. A no-fault cancellation is handled the way rating systems treat an unplayed or abandoned match — disregarded, so neither player is charged2. When neither side appears, it's a double walkover / double default — with no one present to award the win to, neither side is credited and neither advances; a standings league charges both a loss7.

3 ·Worked example

Illustrative mini-ladder of six players (sample data only). This is a doubles league, so every match is two pairs — four players, and each player is ranked on the matches they play alongside different partners. To keep the example readable we follow only the players whose record is affected. It includes one walkover and one cancelled match so you can see how an unplayed match flows into the table.

Two of the matches weren't played normally — impact on every player in the pair

Doubles means four players — two pairs in every match, so an abnormal match lands on all of them, not one. Here's exactly what each did to each player's record.

MatchPairPlayerResultGamesScheduled?Effect on their record
Walkover
Player 4 no-showed
Showed up
take the walkover
Player 6Win0Yes — countsA win — lifts Win %; no games to add
Player 1Win0Yes — countsA win — lifts Win %; no games to add
No-show pair
couldn't field a team
Player 4Loss0Yes — countsA loss — drops Win %; 0 games
Player 3Loss0Yes — countsA loss — drops Win %; 0 games
Cancelled
Rained out, no fault
Pair A
Players 5 & 6
Player 5VoidNoNo effect — shows 4 scheduled, not 5
Player 6VoidNoNo effect — shows 4 scheduled, not 5
Pair B
opposing pair · full field
OpponentVoidNoNo effect
OpponentVoidNoNo effect

Reading it: a walkover credits the pair that showed a win and charges the no-show's pair a lossno games either way. Because it still counts as a scheduled match, that win lifts the winners' Win % and the loss drops the no-show side's; the zero games don't matter here, since a walkover is 0/0 for Games %. A cancelled match is voided for everyone in it and isn't a scheduled match, so Players 5 & 6 show 4 scheduled, not 5. Note Player 3 showed up but still takes the loss because the pair couldn't field a team — that's exactly the case a consented substitute is designed to rescue.

#PlayerSchedPldWLWin %Games %Games won
1Player 25550100%69.0%40
2Player 1553260%53.1%34
3Player 4553260%51.7%30
4Player 5441325%45.5%20
5Player 6441325%41.7%20
6Player 3551420%46.9%30

Reading the tiebreaks: Win % sets the order. Player 1 and Player 4 both win 60%, so Games % breaks it — Player 1's 53.1% clears Player 4's 51.7%. Player 5 and Player 6 both win 25%, so Games % decides again — 45.5% edges 41.7%. Notice Player 3 sits last: he banked the same 30 games won as Player 4 and a higher Games % (46.9%) than Players 5 & 6 — yet his Win % (20%) is the lowest, and winning matches comes first. That's the whole point of the Games-won column being informational: it feeds Games %, but Win % is what sets the rank. Player 4 (walkover no-show) still carries that loss; Players 5 & 6 each show 4 scheduled from the voided match.

What "Games %" is for. Games % = games won ÷ games played (e.g. Player 2's 40 of 58 = 69.0%). It's the first tiebreak, used when two players are level on Win %. It rewards winning decisively and losing narrowly — the player who takes a higher share of the games they contest ranks ahead. If it's still level, head-to-head is the final decider. Note: a walkover or double walkover adds 0 games won and 0 games played, so it doesn't move Games % at all — that tiebreak reflects only matches actually contested. The Games won column is the raw number Games % is built from — shown for transparency, but it doesn't set your rank: Win % does.
Rules crosswalk The order shown here — Win % → Games % → head-to-head — is the standard one the ITF, LTA and ATP use to rank a round-robin group: most wins first, then head-to-head and percentage of games won5. PTC ranks on match wins (as a rate) exactly like the pro tours, with Games % rewarding how you competed.

4 ·Shared slots — credited fairly

Some positions are shared by two players who split one slot due to unavoidable availability issues (for 2026, one position in Women's Doubles is shared this way). A shared slot is only a scheduling device — it never earns points itself. Exactly one of the two — call them Player X and Player Y — plays each match, plays it in full, and only that player is credited with the win and the games.

Worked example. Player X wins 5 of her 6 matches (83%); full-slate Player Z wins 6 of 10 (60%) — so Player X ranks higher on Win %, and the smaller schedule doesn't count against her. A shared player with very few matches so far is shown but tagged provisional until they reach the minimum needed for a play-off seed.
#PlayerSchedPldWLWin %Games %Games won
1Player X shared665183.3%61.5%48
2Player Z10106460.0%55.2%74
3Player Y shared441325.0%42.9%18

Reading it: Player X (shared, 6 scheduled) ranks above full-slate Player Z because she wins a bigger share of her matches — 83% to 60% (and takes a bigger share of games, 61.5% to 55.2%), even with four fewer matches — the smaller fixed schedule neither helps nor hurts. Player Y is tagged provisional until they reach the minimum matches needed for a play-off seed.

“But Player Z won more matches and played more — why is Player X ahead?” Because the ladder measures how often you win, not how many times. Player X wins 83% of her matches; Player Z wins 60% — and Z's one extra win came bundled with four losses, not one. Z's bigger total comes from playing more, not playing better. It's like a test-score average: a student who passes 5 of 6 exams (83%) beats one who passes 6 of 10 (60%) — you don't rank higher just for sitting more exams. Player X also takes a bigger share of the games she plays (61.5% vs 55.2%), so she leads on every measure — she is simply the more reliable winner.
“Then what stopped Player Z from taking a shared slot to rank higher?” Nothing would be gained by it — a shared slot changes how many matches you play, never how often you win. If Z (a 60% player) had shared a slot and played only six matches, Z would still win about 60% and still sit below Player X. Sharing removes the penalty for playing fewer; it never adds a bonus to your win rate. And you can't stack the deck — the schedule is fixed and shared slots are arranged for genuine availability and approved by the organizers (like a substitute), so there are no easy nights to cherry-pick. A shared player who has barely played is tagged provisional until they've played enough for the rate to mean something.
Rules crosswalk A shared position works like a tournament alternate or a team-tennis roster: it's a scheduling device, and each player keeps their own record — never merged — exactly as an ATP alternate keeps a separate line4. Comparing players on a per-scheduled-match rate follows round-robin convention, where set- and game-percentages (not raw totals) separate a group and a smaller slate neither inflates nor buries a record5.

Rules crosswalk — how PTC compares to USTA & the pro tours

These footnotes benchmark the four situations above against established tennis rules. PTC follows the same principles and, where noted, adds a stricter fairness guard suited to an informal, individually-ranked league.

  1. Walkover = a win with no score played. Across sanctioned tennis a walkover credits the player who appeared with a win, and no games or score are entered — it is not a played result. USTA — entering a walkover; UTR — effect of walkovers.
  2. Unplayed / abandoned matches are disregarded. Rating systems do not count walkovers, defaults, double-walkovers or abandoned matches — the same logic behind PTC voiding a no-fault cancellation for both players. UTR — non-completed matches.
  3. An alternate is scored on their own account. At the Nitto ATP Finals an alternate who replaces a withdrawn player “does not inherit the results of the player he is replacing” — exactly PTC's “only who plays is credited.” ATP Finals — alternates; Nitto ATP Finals — rules & format.
  4. Split positions keep separate records. Tournament alternates and team-competition rosters each own their own match record rather than combining into one line — the model PTC uses for a shared slot. ATP Finals — alternates.
  5. Round-robin tiebreak order. Groups are ranked by matches won, then head-to-head, then percentage of sets and games won (ATP additionally weighs matches played, so a 1–2 outranks 1–1) — the toolkit behind PTC's Win % / Games % / head-to-head steps. LTA — round-robin standings; Nitto ATP Finals — format.
  6. Substitutes by sanction; the player on court is credited. USTA prohibits substitutions once line-ups are exchanged except in defined cases (e.g. warm-up injury); the player who actually plays owns the result. USTA — league substitutions.
  7. Double walkover / double default. When neither side appears there is no one to award the win to — the match is a double walkover: neither side is credited a win and neither advances, and rating systems disregard it entirely. A standings-based league instead charges both sides the loss so a mutual no-show earns nothing. UTR — walkovers & double walkovers; walkover explainer.

Reading a match number

Every match carries a short ID on the Results tab so anyone can point to it: M1men's, W1women's, X1mixed — numbered in date and time order within each discipline (on the current schedule, men's run M1–M39, women's W1–W14, mixed X1–X18).

Mixed doubles — its own event

Its own ranked competition. Mixed is scored and ranked on its own, completely separate from the Men's and Women's Doubles ladders — those are different competitions and don't feed into it.

Mixed is played by the members who enter it — currently 6 men × 6 women (a player can sit mixed out while still competing in their own event). Everyone partners everyone once, scored by the same ladder rules (Win % → Games % → head-to-head), but players are ranked in two separate groups so genders are never compared against each other:

Men in mixed

All 6 men ranked against each other. Every man plays 6 mixed matches, so the field is even.

Women in mixed

All 6 women ranked against each other. Every woman plays 6 mixed matches, so the field is even.

These two rankings feed the mixed play-off: the top 2 men and top 2 women advance to a four-player round-robin (each man partners each woman), which re-ranks them and sets a balanced final pairing. Because men are only compared to men and women to women, the two groups are always ranked on their own terms. The full format is on the separate Semis & Finals page.

Play-offs

Moved to its own page. How the season standings feed the semi-finals and finals — three separate top-4 play-offs (Men's, Women's, Mixed) — is now covered in the companion Semis & Finals page, so this page stays focused on ranking and points.